Multi-Model Debate Engine
ProductionThe adversarial multi-model architecture debate process.
Executive Summary StructZero assigns distinct LLM models (Gemini, Claude, DeepSeek) to opposing roles (Architect, Reviewer, Judge) to critique designs and eliminate hallucinations before writing code.
The 7-Step Debate Sequence
stateDiagram-v2
[*] --> SpecReceived
SpecReceived --> DraftProposal: Architect Role
DraftProposal --> AdversarialReview: Reviewer Role
AdversarialReview --> FlagDefects: Detect Conflicts
FlagDefects --> JudgeEvaluation: Judge Role
JudgeEvaluation --> ApprovedPatch: Issue Consensus
ApprovedPatch --> [*]: Hand off to Certification
Capabilities
Key Features & Technical Pillars
Independent Critique
Reviewer models evaluate drafts without seeing prior model bias.
Binding Judge Resolution
A reasoning-tier model evaluates arguments and approves a definitive architectural patch.
Multi-Provider Resilience
Prevents vendor lock-in by utilizing Anthropic, Google, DeepSeek, and local endpoints.
Got Questions?
Frequently Asked Questions
How many models participate in a debate?
Standard debates engage 3 to 5 independent model instances depending on project complexity.
Knowledge Graph
Related Knowledge Base Pages
Ready to deploy with StructZero?
Connect StructZero's multi-agent debate engine directly into your existing editor using Model Context Protocol (MCP).